A Plagiarism Detection System for Arabic Documents. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), 895–909. The use and analysis of anti-plagiarism software: Turnitin tool for formative assessment and feedback. User-centered design for technology-enabled services for eating disorders. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. European Perspectives of Academic Integrity. Jakarta: Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs. Decree 7142 of Director General of Islamic Education on Plagiarism Prevention in State Islamic Higher Education Institutions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 1414–1418. Psychometric Evaluation of the USE (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) Questionnaire for Reliability and Validity. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th edition).
Comparative Analysis of Institutional Policy Definitions of Plagiarism: A Pan-Canadian University Study. Sabbaghan (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the IDEAS Conference 2017 Leading Educational Change. Plagiarism: Moving from punitive to pro-active approaches. Įaton, Sarah E., Guglielmin, M., & Otoo, B. Costanzo (Eds.), Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (Vol. European Portuguese Validation of Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE). Making decisions on management of plagiarism cases where there is a deliberate attempt to cheat. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5(3), 102–109. Preventing Plagiarism and Fostering Academic Integrity: A Practical Approach. Plagiarism Among Iranian Graduate Students of Language Studies: Perspectives and Causes.
#Lektor kepala in english software#
As one of the first attempts to evaluate the usability of text-matching software from the EFL teachers’ perspective, this study has research and educational implications as it highlights avenues for preventing plagiarism via the software usability evaluation.Âīabaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. They could arm themselves with the software to prevent plagiarism. The study showed that the software was useful for checking similarities between texts, easy to learn and use and could satisfy the teachers. High mean agreement ratings across the four dimensions were revealed as 28 items were highly positively perceived between 6 (agree) and 7 (strongly agree) and two items were rated between 5 (slightly agree) and 6 (agree).
#Lektor kepala in english free#
To assess how useful, easy to learn, easy to use, and satisfying the software was for them, 30 EFL teachers took anonymously an online 30-item questionnaire of 7-point Likert scale after they had downloaded and run a free version of the software.
To prevent plagiarism, one of the methods widely employed is the use of plagiarism detection software such as Plagiarism Checker X. EFL teachers sometimes struggle harder to prevent their students’ committing plagiarism because the students’ limited EFL proficiency could be a cause of plagiarism.
0 kommentar(er)
